During a Virat Hindu Sammelan, spiritual leader Pawan Sinha argued that the establishment of a “Hindu Rashtra” is essential, as political power alone cannot guarantee protection, citing the alleged destruction of temples even under “strong governments.” Sinha urged Hindus to instill a sense of “Shatrubodh” (awareness of the enemy) in their daughters to prevent them from being “trapped” in “love jihad,” while asserting that if Hindu youth are taught they are sarvshreshtha (superior), they will not seek unions outside the faith. He reiterated historical grievances, specifically rejecting the inclusion of Akbar and Aurangzeb in Indian history curricula. Crediting the RSS for preventing mass conversions in India, Sinha concluded that the entire world is “planning to kill” Hindus despite their global minority status.
Religious preacher and politician Acharya Pramod Krishnam framed India exclusively as a “Hindu Rashtra” and “Hindusthan” and asserted that historical traitors caused the nation’s enslavement and glorified the act of Jauhar (ritual self-immolation) by Hindu women as a superior alternative to being captured by invaders. Krishnam claimed that Mughal-era mosques, specifically highlighting the Sambhal temple site, were built not for prayer but to “destroy the faith” of Hindus by targeting places where gods were believed to manifest.